Breakdown of scores across the 5 orthogonal dimensions
ISO timestamp of the evaluation
Academic letter grade based on score
Identified hallucinations with severity grading
Identifier of the judge ('gemini' | 'chatgpt' | 'claude' | custom)
Model name used for evaluation (e.g. 'gemini-2.5-flash', 'gpt-4o', 'claude-3-5-sonnet')
Key source concepts or diagnostic items omitted in the extraction
Actionable suggestions to improve the extraction prompt or pipeline
Overall weighted qualitative score between 0 and 100
Strong aspects of the extraction
Qualitative auditor executive summary
Automated pipeline verdict
Standard qualitative evaluation report returned by a single LLM judge.